Surgery for early-stage lung cancer with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thoracotomy: A narrative review.

Recommending video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) over open thoracotomy to patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. Accordingly, we reviewed randomized comparative studies to determine the risks and benefits of VATS lobectomy. Electronic searches on PubMed with standard search terms revealed 97 comparative studies published between 1990 and 2022. Of those, only 5 were randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) and 1 is still ongoing although initial data has been published as an abstract form. A total of 918 patients were evaluated in 5 RCT's. All studies included patients with known or suspected primary lung cancer randomized in a 1:1 ratio to VATS or thoracotomy. Between 2 studies, reports of 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival were found to be similar across surgical modalities. Additionally, no differences were found in the rates of locoregional and distant recurrence. Three studies reported no statistical differences in the number of hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes sampled. Two studies found decreased length of stay following VATS (4 days v 5 days, P = 0.027 and P = 0.008), while 2 found no difference. Increased in-hospital complications were seen in 2 studies (P = 0.008 and P = 0.039). VATS was associated with decreased pain scores, better self-reported QOL at 52 weeks (P = 0.014). Few randomized clinical trials comparing VATS lobectomy to open thoracotomy and lobectomy in early stage NSCLC have been reported. These studies suggest that VATS lobectomy offers similar outcomes with decreased in-hospital complications, pain, length of stay, and improved physical functioning when compared to thoracotomy.

Staged retroperitoneal mesenteric revascularisation and aortobifemoral bypass after endovascular rescue for acute mesenteric ischaemia.

Visceral artery revascularisation through a retroperitoneal approach provides an infrequent yet viable, alternative means of managing mesenteric ischaemia in patients with previous abdominal operations. We present a unique case implementing this surgical approach in a 55-year-old man in which we performed a retroperitoneal aortobifemoral bypass with concomitant retrograde jump graft from the aortic prosthesis to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) for bilateral lower extremity rest pain and chronic mesenteric ischaemia. Three months previously, the patient had presented with acute mesenteric ischaemia and colonic perforation. He underwent emergent celiac artery stenting followed by an exploratory laparotomy with total abdominal colectomy and diverting loop ileostomy. Given the patient's hostile abdomen, a retroperitoneal approach to SMA revascularisation was elected over a transabdominal approach during concomitant lower extremity revascularisation for critical limb ischaemia. We achieved an excellent technical result with resolution of limb ischaemia and abdominal symptoms.